Surveillance Is Responsible For Verifying The Diagnosis...

Surveillance is responsible for verifying the diagnosis and treatment of all reportable STDs from public and private health care providers; private and public hospitals, laboratories, physicians and other health related care providers, as required by law, report positive STDs such as syphilis and HIV to the MDCHD on a daily basis STD Control and Prevention (n.d). If a person is tested positive for syphilis, the UCF Community Care Center will have to report it to the Florida Department. We have to do this so that the public health officials can monitor syphilis epidemic in the state of Florida. Another reason why we have to report it to the health department is because the health department wants to know if the disease is the strongest in that state. Even though the person is a highly recognizable and highly influential member of the community, we have to report it to the Florida health department. Before the Florida health department report or send in any information to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, they will make sure that his or her information is kept private, they will not disclose any personal information about the person who is tested positive for syphilis. The law that governs this is the Florida Administrative Code 64D-3, entitled Control of Communicable Diseases and Conditions, which may significantly Affect Public Health, is the mandate that empowers the Department of Health to record communicable diseases and dictates when and how

The Income Inequality Gap Essay - 1123 Words

Recently, studies have shown that income inequality has many connections that have caused the gap in the United States. According to the research I found, income inequality is connected to corruption, trade, wages of workers, and education. The world income inequality had declined since the twentieth century according to the studies found (Clark). Corruption falls increasing on low income individuals more than higher income individuals. Additionally, the trade theory suggests that the free trade might have level up the income inequality higher within countries by the different patterns of wages and demand for workers who are skilled and unskilled (Silva and Leichenko). Moreover, the education of wealthier people has it easier because the†¦show more content†¦Thus, corruption proposes that since the government is spending money away from programs that could benefits more of the lower income individuals. For examples, the government couldn’t provide public goods like ed ucation and health that could help the low income individuals because of the tax system. Yet, the higher income individuals have access to resources that the lower incomes individual don’t have to evade taxes by bribing government officials to lean on their side known as lobbying (Dincer and Gunlap). This research shows that the higher income individuals have a better chance to bribe governments causing the gap in income inequality in the economy because they have the resources to do it. Meanwhile, Silva and Leichenko purpose that free trade has increased the income inequality in the United States economy, but also within other countries. The trade theory research founded by Silva and Leichenko shows that by changing the patterns of the wages and demands for workers that are skilled and unskilled will affect the inequality of income. According to the studies, they found that there is a polarization between the wages of skilled and unskilled workers that has taken a hold of th e income inequality (Silva and Leichenko). Thus, people who are unskilled usually don’t get paid as much as skilled workers because they don’t have the same knowledge level. Stated by Silva and Leichenko, â€Å"advanced countriesShow MoreRelatedLarge Gaps Of Wealth And Income Inequality2159 Words   |  9 Pages LARGE GAPS IN WEALTH AND INCOME INEQUALITY INFLUENCE DEMOCRACY IN THE U.S. Karen Freitas Ashford University September 05th, 2014 Large gaps in wealth and income inequality influence democracy in the United States Human development is majorly concerned with what the state government is doing to make its citizens transform their environment to a productive and creative atmosphere, which can make them acquire all their needs and interests. People are the real wealth of any given nation, thereforeRead MoreIncome Inequality and Society1028 Words   |  5 Pages Income Inequality’s affect on Society Income inequality is on the rise and it is evident in most cities throughout the United States. There are individuals with six to seven figure incomes and then there are individuals whose income is just enough to get by. The middle class is not as prominent as the upper and lower class. This should be the other way around. There should not be so many cities with very wealthy neighborhoods right next door to low class, rundown neighborhoods, with little middleRead MoreThe Context Of Growing Economic Interdependence1672 Words   |  7 Pages(globalisation); inequality is both growing within and between nations. In turn, analysing the following the following statement that â€Å"Inequality can undermine economic, social and perhaps even political stability. It can tear the very fabric that holds society together. We now have firm evidence that a severely skewed income distribution harms the pace and sustainability of growth over the longer term. The growing gap between the rich and poor is now at its highest levels due to wealth disparity, income inequalityRead MoreIncome Inequality And Poverty989 Words   |  4 Pages â€Å"Income inequality has no necessary connection with poverty, the lack of material resources for a decent life, such as adequate food, shelter, and clothing. A society with great income inequality may have no poor people, and a society with no income inequality may have nothing but poor people† - Robert Higgs. When people think of income inequality they picture poverty and people not having basic necessities. However income inequality is not just a connection to the poor. Income inequality is stronglyRead MoreInequality in Social Classes1668 Words   |  7 Pagesin a society full of equality, where everyone would have the same income, house, and social class, in other words a ‘perfect’ world, free of competition, greed, classes, and more importantly inequality. Unfortunately, living i n classless society falls under the category of a utopia, as long as greed exists in the heart of society, inequality and the division between classes is not going to end. As Mary Douglas once stated, â€Å"Inequality can have a bad downside, but equality, for its part, sure does getRead MoreImpact Of The Income Inequality On The American Dream1742 Words   |  7 PagesImpact of the Income Inequality on the American Dream The book called They Say I say with Readings contains multiple articles. However, chapter nineteen focuses on the American Dream. Chapter nineteen, â€Å"What’s Up with the American Dream?† indicates how the article will be focusing on the American Dream. The American Dream changes over the course of time as the income inequality widens between the higher and lower class. Few events occurred that affected the income, which led to a growing gap betweenRead MoreThe American Dream866 Words   |  4 Pagesdue to income inequality: gender pay gap and ethnic wage gap. Income inequality is the unequal distribution of household or individual income across the various participants in an economy, and is often presented as the percentage of income to a percentage of population (Income inequality, Investopedia). In the United States income inequality has increased significantly since the 1970s after several decades of stability, which means the share of the nations income received by higher income householdsRead MoreWealth Inequality in the US with Sociological Viewpoints Essay1102 Words   |  5 PagesWhat is wealth inequality? â€Å"It is the difference between individuals or populations in the distribution of assets, wealth or income.† [1] In sociology, the term is social stratification and refers to â€Å"a system of structured social inequality† [2] where the inequality might be in power, resources, social standing/class or perceived worth. In the US, where a class system exist, (as opposed to caste or estate system) your place in t he class system can be determined by your personal achievements. HoweverRead MoreInequality Between Education And Education Essay1583 Words   |  7 PagesInequality in Education Money Matters The United States had gone through so many changes over the years and with each change we could say that we have become a better nation. Along the way to becoming a better nation, we have gone through highs and lows; however there seems to be a constant low that is now taking a toll on our children. The low may also end up having an effect on our future and that low is inequality in education among minority races and low income students. Low income studentsRead More Increasing the Minimum Wage Will Reduce Income Inequality Essay1252 Words   |  6 Pageswage does not even lift a family out of poverty. -- Jon Corzine Income inequality has been a major problem facing American society for decades, but has recently become a major concern. I personally believe the major gap between the income of the rich and poor is a not just, but is not a major concern for the government and society. If the Federal Government addresses other major concerns facing American citizens the inequality will be adjusted due to other changes. The government needs to step

Implementing School Vouchers Program Free Essays

Most Americans believe that improving our system of education should be a top priority for government at the local, state, and Federal levels. Legislators, school boards, education professionals, parent groups, and community organizations are attempting to implement innovative ideas to rescue children from failing school systems, particularly in inner-city neighborhoods. Many of these groups support the voucher program. We will write a custom essay sample on Implementing School Vouchers Program or any similar topic only for you Order Now The standard program proposed in dozens of states across the country would distribute monetary vouchers (ranging in values between $2,500-$5,000) to parents of school-aged children, usually in troubled inner-city school districts. Parents could then use the vouchers towards the cost of tuition at private schools, including those dedicated to religious indoctrination. School vouchers might seem a relatively great way to increase the options poor parents have for educating their children, when in fact, vouchers pose as a serious threat to values that are vital to the health of American democracy. These programs subvert the constitutional principle of separation of church and state and threaten to undermine our system of public education. Implementation of voucher programs sends a clear message that we are giving up on public education. Even though vouchers would help some students, they will not help all. Public education is for all children, regardless of their religion, academic talents or their ability to pay. This policy has made public schools the backbone of American democracy, helping young people grow into responsible citizens. Supporters of the voucher program, include that the program offers parents a choice. In fact, vouchers only guarantee that some parents will have some taxpayers money to put towards a child†s private school tuition. No voucher system will cover the total cost of tuition, when tuition in a private school averages $10,000 per year, and the voucher totals less than $5,000. This leaves the parents still having to pay thousands of dollars, and most families cannot come up with the rest of the money to cover tuition costs. Voucher systems do not guarantee that every child who applies will be selected to attend the private school. Many religious schools currently reject two of every three children who apply. The only thing that vouchers guarantee is that taxes will go up. Taxpayers will be forced to foot the bill for the vouchers, but they will have to pick up the tab for a whole new bureaucracy, including hidden costs like transportation. Vouchers will also force taxpayers to support two entire education systems, public and private. To make things worse, no extra money will be given to the schools that desperately need taxpayers support. Being one of the most diverse countries in the world, the public school system stands as an institution that unifies Americans. Under the voucher program, our educational system, and our country would become more separated than it already is. With the help of taxpayers† dollars, private schools would be filled with wealthy and middle-class students, and the motivated students from inner cities. Some public schools would be left with fewer dollars to teach and the poorest of the poor and other students who, for one reason or another were not private school material. All these situations would hardly benefit public education. Many studies suggest that vouchers are good for public schools yet, there is little evidence that they will ultimately improve the quality of public education for those who need it most. Proposition 38 would change public education statewide without first experimenting to determine what type of state subsidy would lead to high quality education for most children. California†s public school enrollment exceeds 6 million, and the number of students willing to leave public schools in unknown, but there is an even smaller percentage of the number of spaces existing in private schools for these students willing to leave. (â€Å"Draper Initiative†) Proposition 38 is a huge and costly experiment that hold little accusations of improving student achievement, and does not provide real education choice. In conclusion, school voucher programs undermine two great American traditions, universal public education and the separation of the church and state. Instead of embracing vouchers, communities across the country should dedicate themselves to finding solutions that will be available to every American school aged child. Voucher programs will not allow the parent to make the choice of what school their child attends, but the voucher school will make the choice in which what school students can attend. Voucher schools get the money that taxpayers† are paying for, these children to attend these private schools, but these children are still being rejected for many reasons. The end argument should be whether or not vouchers will lead to full educational freedom, and most likely it will not. How to cite Implementing School Vouchers Program, Papers